2024 Award Nominations

The Mental Health Matters Awards honours the exceptional accomplishments of individuals, groups, and organisations dedicated to improving understanding, awareness, service provision, and the overall mental health of communities in NSW over the previous year (2023-2024).

Nominations are now OPEN.

Prizes for award winners
The winner of each award category will receive $1000 and an engraved award plaquette.

Judging Panel
Our judging panel comprises of independent mental health experts, professionals from the sector, past award recipients, and individuals specialising in specific categories. Wayahead staff are not involved in the judging process for the awards.

How to nominate

Do you know someone making remarkable contributions to mental health? Nominate yourself, a program you’re involved with, or an individual or initiative you admire for their outstanding work.

We are here to help and answer any questions you may have about the Awards or the nomination process, including support to complete your nomination. Contact us on (02) 9339 6021 or promo.admin@wayahead.org.au

For full category descriptions, eligibility criteria, and nomination links, please refer to the details provided below.

Nominate criteria

    Please review the following guidelines before submitting a nomination:

    • Nominations should relate to projects, programs, or initiatives that are accessible to and hold significance for the people of NSW.
    • We kindly ask that nominations are not submitted for consideration in multiple categories.
    • Each organisation or individual may submit only one nomination; quality of nominations will be prioritised over quantity.
    • Staff and volunteers affiliated with Wayahead, as well as sponsors of the Awards (such as ACON), are ineligible for nomination.
    • Previous award recipients are not eligible for self-nomination for a period of three years following their award.

    Nomination Questions

    How the Awards are judged

    Each nomination will be judged by a panel of judges with relevant expertise.

    Judging is based on the following criteria:

    Appropriateness
    Does the nomination match the category description, and does it reflect the heart of the category? Is the nomination is the best possible example of that category?

    Innovation and approach
    Is the nomination doing something new? Combining existing things in new ways? Or are they bringing new perspectives to existing systems? Is the approach taken by the nomination appropriate? Does it reach the people it aims to? Do the aims of the project match the approach taken?

    Involvement
    How are consumers, carers, and/or community involved in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the nomination? Note: as a rule, we favour those which show clear evidence of consumer, carer, and/or community involvement in all stages. For the “Leadership through Lived Experience Award” this criterion is adjusted to focus on the leadership aspects, including demonstration of incorporating principles of consumer leadership, co-design, and building these skills in others.

    Response
    How has the project been received and what impact has it had? Has the response been well received by the target audience/group? Has there been strong interest in the project or positive evaluation? Not all projects will have access to detailed evaluation techniques. Nominations will not be penalised for not having access to intricate evaluation techniques. Do the outcomes/response match the aims and/or are appropriate to the project.

      Award Nominations

      Click on your category below to submit your nomination.